Science Blog

Thomas Edison is most associated with the light bulb but he didn't actually invent it. That being said, it should be viewed as a wrongdoing that he continuously is the face of the light bulb. Although, Edison did play a part in providing aid to this innovative creation. This fact alone shouldn't give him all the glory of the creation. The credit should be mostly given to the true inventor of the light bulb, Frederick De Moleyns.
Nearly 40 years before Edison, Frederick claimed the first patent lightbulb in 1841. Although, the light bulbs weren't commercially viable and too expensive. Joseph Swan also created another version of the light bulb a year before Edison but ran into the same consumer problem as Frederick. Finally, Edison came into the picture and created his own version of the light bulb. Unlike the other two men, Edison found a way for his to be commercially viable to the masses.
Now if you want to say Edison was the first to make the light bulb commercially viable, that's fine. That's a grand difference between being the first to create the lightbulb. Even though Frederick didn't succeed in making it available for the masses, he still created the patent for it first. Just because you revolutionize an item, it doesn't mean you created the item. Edison's work is still much appreciated by many regardless.
There has been many adaptations of the light bulb created over the course of time. There have been many men that tried to make electricity for the public as well. Edison found a breakthrough with his although and the rest is history. Once again, Edison deserves praise for what he did for humanity as a whole. Although, he wasn't and will never be the original creator of the light bulb invention.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Celebrations blog

Image
Valentine's day origin may seem innocent but it's quite the opposite. In the multiple articles that explain the origins of the holiday, I chose "The Dark Origins of Valentine's Day" by Arnie Seipel. I found this one appealing because it had the most intriguing title and had more life in general. Yes, all of these articles did a good job at detailing the true nature of the holiday but only one did it in an interesting way. The article "History of Valentine's day" by the history channel was well informed but overstocked with facts. There was no life to the article at all. Unlike the article written by Arnie, "The Dark Origins of Valentines Day"  had facts but also had personality in the writing. In conclusion, "The Dark Origins of Valentine's Day" outshined the other articles because it was the most unique and not bland like the others. sources:  https://www.npr.org/2011/02/14/133693152/the-dark-origins-of-valentines-day
Read more

Race Blog

Image
Before there was Barrack Obama, George Edwin Taylor became the first African American to run for president of the United States. George Edwin Taylor was born in 1857 and was a journalist until he got involved in politics. He got into politics because he saw the lack of representation and interest for people of color in politics. George knew he would be taken lightly by white people but still continued with his beliefs. Using the platform given to him by the all black third party, he showed that people of color had interest of having power in politics. George's attempt at presidency was more for symbolic reason rather than an actual shot at being president. His goal worked because this led to more activity from African Americans in politics. He was viewed as an idol due to his example of perseverance and bravery for this matter. Years after his death, there was a continuation of all black independent political parties as well. African Americans now play a futile part in polit
Read more

Political Blog Post

Image
President Trump is currently going through a rigorous impeachment process. Another president in history that went through this was Andrew Johnson and both impeachments are comparable. Both were accused for wanting personal gains that involved power. Although, they both have their differences as well. The fall from grace for both men is saddening and an abomination in itself. Trump is facing impeachment due to allegations that he looked for help from Ukraine politics to get reelected in the upcoming election, getting dirt on competition in the election, and obstructing congress. Johnson was facing impeachment due to political conflict and conflicting ideas in the government revolving around the Tenure of Office Act. The main similarity is the fact they both wanted to act on their selfish beliefs for their own gain. They both were trying to disrupt the natural political system and both tried to get rid of "corruption" within government. Then finally, both were obviousl
Read more